Facial Recognition Technology Challenges for People with Facial Differences 

By Tess Buckley

In our increasingly digital world, facial recognition technology (FRT) has become ubiquitous, from unlocking our smartphones to passing through airport security. This technology, which promises convenience and enhanced security, relies on algorithms to identify and authenticate individuals based on their facial features. However, for people with facial differences, this technological advancement often falls short, highlighting an oversight in the design and implementation of these systems.

Facial recognition technology works by mapping key points on a face and comparing them to a database of known faces. The accuracy of these systems heavily depends on the diversity and quality of the data used to train them. Herein lies a critical problem: most facial recognition algorithms are trained on datasets that predominantly feature “typical” faces, often failing to account for the wide range of human facial diversity.

This oversight creates challenges for individuals with facial differences. People with conditions such as cleft lip and palate, facial palsy, or those who have undergone facial reconstruction surgery often find that these technologies struggle to recognise them consistently. With some community members struggling to open their phone, it seems a small thing, but it’s a constant reminder that technology isn’t designed with us in mind.

The implications of this technological shortcoming extend beyond mere inconvenience. As facial recognition becomes integrated into our daily lives – used in everything from banking applications to building access systems – those who aren’t reliably recognised by these technologies risk being excluded from essential services and spaces. This technological oversight inadvertently reinforces societal biases, perpetuating the marginalisation of individuals with facial differences. Moreover, the failure of FRT to account for facial differences raises significant privacy and security concerns. If these systems can’t reliably identify individuals with facial differences, it potentially leaves them more vulnerable to identity theft or mistaken identity in security situations.

Addressing these challenges requires a need to diversify the datasets used to train facial recognition algorithms. This means actively including a wide range of facial differences in the development process. Tech companies can collaborate with organisations representing people with facial differences to ensure their technologies are inclusive and effective for all users. Additionally, developers could consider alternative or complementary authentication methods that can work alongside FRT. This could include voice recognition, fingerprint scanning, or other biometric measures that provide reliable authentication for those who may struggle with facial recognition systems.

As we continue to integrate FRT into our society, it’s crucial that we do so in a way that doesn’t leave anyone behind. The challenges faced by people with facial differences in this arena are a reminder of the importance of inclusive design in technology. By considering the full spectrum of human diversity in our tech developments, we can create a more accessible digital world.

Read the results of the FEI’s facial recognition survey.

Read more of our blogs here.